Have any of you used apverb?

[jmh]

I came across a deesser on some forum. As I was investigating, what interested me more was their reverb. The guy who wrote it has some other odd plugins and a couple of uninteresting (to me) midi plugins that make me less inclined to take a chance on the bundle.

https://www.apulsoft.ch/apverb/

...just curious if any of you have used this - and if so, that it plays well in studio.

[mr_es335]

jmh,

I have not employed this plug-in. Any of the FabFilter plug-in meet all of current my needs!

I just sent apulsoft a message to see if JUCE is employed in the development of their plug-ins.

Also, it IS worth noting, that SAC is a preferable testing environment for plug-ins. SAW permits latency...SAC does not!

SAC also displays the "slipped buffers" - which the apverb plug-in does create...and many of them.

Why not just obtain any of the FabFilter plug-ins...and "Be Happy!" Great plug-in, all in-house, non-JUCE'd development, great support!
* FabFilter has stopped development of VST2 plug-ins however, but such plug-ins are still available.

Note: Though not necessarily relevant to the topic at hand, software development is both a lengthy and therefore, costly, endeavor. Have a perusal of the following article: [Click+Me]
* Make note of "Black Swans"!
* Employing JUCE, this development time can be reduced by as much as 60%!! At least this is what I was told when I subscribed to their platform for a time [three months on the the Indie plan].
* Much like SynthEdit and others, you do not really need top be a "programmer" in the truest sense of the word, - just "a piece-er and a put-ter together-er!"
* Everyone needs to contact the developer and ask them if JUCE is being employed! I id, and I was very disappointed to see how many were in fact, employing JUCE [Click_Me]

[jmh]

SAC is a preferable testing environment for plug-ins. SAW permits latency...SAC does not!

A consideration for some, but not being a sac user, not me.

Just out of curiosity, does SAC continue to operate with a latency inducing plugin? If so for a delay or reverb plugin on a return or output track (but not the one your live audio is on), once the latency is established does it output with X-many buffers delayed, would it matter?

[mr_es335]

jmh,

You stated, "A consideration for some, but not being a sac user, not me."
* You could download the demo for testing purpose.

You also stated, "Just out of curiosity, does SAC continue to operate with a latency inducing plugin?"
* Answer, "No!"
* From the User Manual, "Note that any plugin causing latency by withholding data can not be used in this live mixing environment and will be detected by the engine and automatically bypassed internally."

[jmh]

]* Answer, "No!"[/size]

Got it.

It reminds me of having a behringer x18 that was bricked that would not respond to the firmware reset button till I sent it back to them. Coincidentally it had a great sounding reverb patched between an input and output pair when it locked up and I used it for a reverb on an analog mixer for a while - which of course could be used as an outboard with sac (although I'm sure there are plenty of decent reverb plugins that don't induce latency).

I came across a something that could provide something related: https://www.hermannseib.com/english/vsthost.htm

[mr_es335]

jmh,

You stated, "I came across a something that could provide something related: https://www.hermannseib.com/english/vsthost.htm"

May I ask "How does vsthost provide something related?"

You also stated, "...although I'm sure there are plenty of decent reverb plugins that don't induce latency..." ...Yes! Try the FabFilter plug-ins!

[jmh]

I have yet to install V2, but still curious if any of you have used any of the apulsoft plugins in studio.

I'm revisiting this question as these are currently on sale.

https://www.apulsoft.ch/apverb/

[TomyN]

I'm usung their app-trigger plugin for years in SAC. Works without flaws.